(no subject)
Jun. 17th, 2004 10:27 amThis (found on Virtual Turntable) is great. The author did a statistical analysis of the words used in Pitchfork music reviews, used the positive and negative scores to "generate a set of compositional guidelines," and wrote some songs.
In other news, I did the "frequent commenters" and "mindmap" memes, and the results weren't very interesting.
The “sadness” group is by far the highest-scoring mood, beating the next mood (“dark”) by over 1100 points. As a response to that, I've tried to make these songs as sad as possible.
In other news, I did the "frequent commenters" and "mindmap" memes, and the results weren't very interesting.
Sad Songs Praised So Much
Date: 2004-06-17 05:42 pm (UTC)Re: Sad Songs Praised So Much
Date: 2004-06-17 05:45 pm (UTC)That's why I didn't do it at first, but then enough people ran it and survived that I decided okay. Also, it's only my work machine.
Re: Sad Songs Praised So Much
Date: 2004-06-17 05:49 pm (UTC)Oh, as long as it's only the work machine... I still haven't gotten the nerve to install a Livejournal client on my work machine. Maybe I'm a wuss, but they came down on e-mail clients, so I didn't feel like risking it.
amusing
Date: 2004-06-17 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 08:06 pm (UTC)number 36erik, where do i stand on your list? this is my favorite meme of all time, so i'm dying to know.i'm going to bookmark that pitchformula link and really sit down and read and analyze it some day. interesting stuff.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 09:27 pm (UTC)I just beat anonymous on another friend's list, which is pretty impressive when you consider that her journal was going for a couple of years before I got an account.