1. Weeks before the opening: Cameron Crowe! Cameron Diaz! That shot of Tom Cruise on the edge of a skyscraper's roof! This should be good.
2. Days before the opening, after
artname and
xythian got back from the preview screening: Uh oh.
3. Opening day, after reading
Roger Ebert's review: Sounds like it might not be as bad as they said.
4. Opening weekend, after seeing it: It's not as bad as they said.
5. Yesterday, after seeing it again on DVD: You know what? It's
good.
6. Today, after seeing
the movie it was based on: It's still a good movie, but I don't understand why Cameron Crowe bothered remaking it--long stretches of his version are almost shot-for-shot identical. Why tell this story again?
7. Tonight, after listening to the commentary by Crowe and Nancy Wilson: It's still a good movie, but the movie I thought I saw isn't the same one Crowe thought he was making, and I'm not sure if I like the movie he thought it was. Fortunately, he encourages alternate interpretations.
( More about the commentary.... )