(no subject)
Sep. 3rd, 2005 09:46 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
jfb"This is the time for politics," in decreasing order of politeness: James Wolcott, Digby, Steve Gilliard.
As with the tsunami last year, the Bush administration's "small government" approach has been to do the minimum required, and then call on the generosity of the American people, through private contributions to charity, to pick up the slack. It's a free market approach to disaster management. And we are generous, and organizations like the Red Cross and the Salvation Army do get lots of money, and it's all heartwarming, and the one thing I hate about it is that then the Republicans can point to all that and say they were right, government really doesn't need to help its citizens.
But here's the thing: It does. The Red Cross, to which most of us non-fundamentalists have been giving our money, is banned from New Orleans. Supposedly the presence of aid organizations in the city would prevent evacuation--but the evacuation is barely happening, as even Fox News reporters will tell you (while their anchors try to focus on "good news"). There are things we need the government to be doing: Evacuation, search and rescue, above all coordination.
Did I say the Bush administration does the minimum required? No, it does less. It actively prevents the minimum effort from being made. The New Mexico National Guard was waiting four days for "paperwork from Washington", food drops by the military are "awaiting a request from FEMA", helicopter delivery of food and supplies was stalled so the President could get his picture taken. People stuck at the convention center and on the bridges are not allowed to walk out of town.
And all this is just the aftermath of what they didn't do before the hurricane hit. FEMA was reduced to a component of "homeland security," told to stop working on disaster preparedness, and placed under the direction first of Bush's campaign manager--seriously--and then Bush's campaign manager's "old friend," a man whose previous experience included attorney at law and failed commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association. (He's "doing a heck of a job," says the President.) Tax cuts and war diverted funds from the Army Corps of Engineers project to prevent flooding. (The Corps knew that "the levees were not designed to withstand a category five hurricane," despite Bush's bizarre claim that no one anticipated a breach.) Oh, and New Orleans's disaster planning was privatized last year, contracted out by DHS to a company with a reputation for bad advice, which is now trying to erase the evidence of its contribution. I'm just hitting the high points.
I'm sure there's another side to some of these stories. I'm sure some of the people who made these decisions thought they had good reasons. But the big picture is this: It's five days since the hurricane hit the coast, and thousands of people are still stuck and starving in a drowned city. The hurricane was a disaster. What's followed is an atrocity.
On the bright side, our nation's leader has promised that Trent Lott will get a new porch.
As with the tsunami last year, the Bush administration's "small government" approach has been to do the minimum required, and then call on the generosity of the American people, through private contributions to charity, to pick up the slack. It's a free market approach to disaster management. And we are generous, and organizations like the Red Cross and the Salvation Army do get lots of money, and it's all heartwarming, and the one thing I hate about it is that then the Republicans can point to all that and say they were right, government really doesn't need to help its citizens.
But here's the thing: It does. The Red Cross, to which most of us non-fundamentalists have been giving our money, is banned from New Orleans. Supposedly the presence of aid organizations in the city would prevent evacuation--but the evacuation is barely happening, as even Fox News reporters will tell you (while their anchors try to focus on "good news"). There are things we need the government to be doing: Evacuation, search and rescue, above all coordination.
Did I say the Bush administration does the minimum required? No, it does less. It actively prevents the minimum effort from being made. The New Mexico National Guard was waiting four days for "paperwork from Washington", food drops by the military are "awaiting a request from FEMA", helicopter delivery of food and supplies was stalled so the President could get his picture taken. People stuck at the convention center and on the bridges are not allowed to walk out of town.
And all this is just the aftermath of what they didn't do before the hurricane hit. FEMA was reduced to a component of "homeland security," told to stop working on disaster preparedness, and placed under the direction first of Bush's campaign manager--seriously--and then Bush's campaign manager's "old friend," a man whose previous experience included attorney at law and failed commissioner of the International Arabian Horse Association. (He's "doing a heck of a job," says the President.) Tax cuts and war diverted funds from the Army Corps of Engineers project to prevent flooding. (The Corps knew that "the levees were not designed to withstand a category five hurricane," despite Bush's bizarre claim that no one anticipated a breach.) Oh, and New Orleans's disaster planning was privatized last year, contracted out by DHS to a company with a reputation for bad advice, which is now trying to erase the evidence of its contribution. I'm just hitting the high points.
I'm sure there's another side to some of these stories. I'm sure some of the people who made these decisions thought they had good reasons. But the big picture is this: It's five days since the hurricane hit the coast, and thousands of people are still stuck and starving in a drowned city. The hurricane was a disaster. What's followed is an atrocity.
On the bright side, our nation's leader has promised that Trent Lott will get a new porch.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 05:14 pm (UTC)The one truly great thing about life in the Internet age is the ability to get the truth from various agenda-less sources. Who needs network news anymore when I can get the no-frills no-chaser version? The amount of indisputable information that's available to anyone with an interest in hearing it is remarkable.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 06:17 pm (UTC)Just watched the video (http://mediamatters.org/items/200509020001), there's no way that's what he meant.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 06:20 pm (UTC)I really enjoyed watching Ted Koppel rip into the FEMA chair. In that Schadenfreude sort of way.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-03 08:55 pm (UTC)Hear, hear: your post is broader, deeper, and much better-documented than what I posted yesterday. (I was glad to learn that Bill Richardson had tried to send his National Guard on Sunday, exactly as I suggested. But he'd've gotten my vote anyway.)