(no subject)

[jfb]

It turns out Rick Santorum's remarks equating homosexuality with polygamy and incest were taken out of context, but the context is that he doesn't think you have a right to any kind of sex in the privacy of your home. That's not what I want to talk about, I just came here to post the best line from the Associated Press interview:

AP: I'm sorry, I didn't think I was going to talk about "man on dog" with a United States senator, it's sort of freaking me out.

Comments

[greyaenigma.livejournal.com]

Except that all state laws are subordinate to the Constitution of the US, and it's the job of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constution's relevance in these situations.

If a state law disagrees with how the Supreme Court decides, BEEP, it is invalid. The business of the federal government is not to be in our bedroom, but to prevent the states from going into our bedrooms when they don't have the right to. The states should not have any right to disregard the Constitutional unalienable rights, even if those right weren't explicitly stated in the original draft.