(no subject)
Feb. 21st, 2003 02:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Joe Conason, in Salon, thinks the anti-war movement should march on Iraq--well, hold demonstrations at Iraq's embassies to protest its failure to cooperate with the United Nations, and to drive home the point that opposition to a U.S. invasion does not equal support for Saddam Hussein.
I think I agree with him. The problem, as I see it, is that we'll have to come up with a whole new batch of pithy slogans.
I think I agree with him. The problem, as I see it, is that we'll have to come up with a whole new batch of pithy slogans.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-21 03:00 pm (UTC)I think we'd have the same problem with Saddam that we have with Dubya -- how do you get them to actually *listen* to the protests?
Although I agree completely that being anti-war (or at least anti- this war) shouldn't be taken as support for tyrants, foreign or domestic.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-21 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-21 06:48 pm (UTC)Pithy Slogan
Date: 2003-02-21 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-21 09:13 pm (UTC)peace!
When do we want it?
as soon as Iraq fully complies with U.N. Resolution 1441 and other relevent resolutions and treaties calling for cooperation with internation inspectors to confirm that it has destroyed all weapons of mass destruction!
no subject
Date: 2003-02-21 10:15 pm (UTC)"Saddam Out of Iraq!"
"Have You Considered Moscow? I Hear It's Lovely This Time of Year"
"Dude, Even Osama Bin Laden Hates You"
"Don't Worry About Gassing The Kurds, Turkey Will Be Happy To Fill In"
"Al Samoud, Shmal Shmamoud"
"Got Bunker?"
"Please Let Your People Know That You Are a Bad, Bad, Bad Man. Then Let At Least Some That You've Told Survive So That They Might Overthrow You. Love, The US."
no subject
Date: 2003-02-21 10:33 pm (UTC)